At the Global Commodities Conference, key economic and political trends came under scrutiny — with speakers agreeing that U.S. President Donald Trump lacks a coherent long-term strategy. According to journalist Alan Friedman, multiple indicators suggest the decline of American global dominance.

Keyu Jin, Professor of Economics at HKUST Business School and Harvard University, opened the discussion with a focus on China. Now firmly established as a global power, China, she explained, had at least eight years to prepare for Trump’s policy disruptions. In response, Beijing has opted for tactical concessions — as long as the global free trade system remains intact. China has made remarkable technological strides and no longer perceives strategic competition with the West as an existential threat.

A Clear Vision

«Chinese leaders,» she explained, «have a very clear vision for the country’s future development: they do not seek an economy driven by finance and communication technologies, as in the United States, but one rooted in industry. And they are acting consistently with that vision. Moreover, the fact that there are still hundreds of millions of low-income individuals in China could actually present an opportunity.»

Furthermore, China is striving to diversify its economy as much as possible by moving up the technological value chain — a shift that should make the country more resilient to the tariffs introduced by Trump. «In 2018,» she concluded, «China was more vulnerable, but it has since made tremendous progress. Of course, it still needs to maintain a strong export sector to ensure economic stability, but in the medium term, domestic consumption will become a key driver of growth.»

Emily Harding, Director of Intelligence, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), then turned the focus to the United States. She emphasized that President Trump does not appear to possess a clearly articulated long-term strategy.

Decisions Based on Instinct

«The issue,» she said, «is that Donald Trump makes decisions based on instinct, and this will shape the future, given that he still has at least three more years in office. He is attempting to rebalance the U.S. trade deficit and bolster domestic industry through tariffs, but he does so using the same tactics that characterized his business dealings — playing hardball, threatening, and negotiating aggressively. But this approach doesn’t always yield results.»

Finally, economist, author, and journalist Alan Friedman delivered a keynote entitled “The Certainty of Uncertainty.” «I’m more pessimistic than my fellow panelists,» he began. «We need to reflect on what Trump has actually accomplished so far — and remember, his term still has another three and a half years to run. The United States is no longer a liberal democracy. I believe we are witnessing the end of the American empire.»

Friedman argued that this trend has been underway for decades but has accelerated dramatically under Trump. «Twenty years from now,» he predicted, «the United States will no longer be the leader of the Western democratic world. Yes, that’s a bold statement. But just look: America, like ancient Rome, has overextended its empire. Its military presence around the world is no longer sufficient to guarantee supremacy. Just consider how things ended in Iraq — now under Iranian influence — and Afghanistan, which is now back under Taliban control. America has been humiliated.»

The End of Multilateralism

«Economically,» Friedman said, «Trump is dismantling multilateralism, and we cannot expect a coherent or stable policy from him — neither politically nor economically. There is no long-term strategic vision. With Trump, every morning brings a new surprise. «Right now, the only real opposition to Trump comes from U.S. Treasury bonds — when their prices fall, interest rates rise.»

Friedman also touched on the erosion of civil liberties. «Trump deployed the National Guard against protesters. And 41% of his supporters believe political violence is acceptable. Trump will likely take full advantage of this.»

Originally published in Italian in the Corriere del Ticino on June 23, 2025 (online) and June 24, 2025 (print edition).

English translation provided by LCTA
Reproduced in full with the author’s kind permission.



Sergio Ermotti, CEO of UBS Group, addressed key financial and geopolitical issues — including the dollar’s global role, protectionist trade measures, and the ongoing integration of Credit Suisse — during his appearance in Lugano at the Global Commodities Conference. By year-end, the bulk of Credit Suisse’s domestic client base will be transitioned onto UBS’s unified IT platform.

The two-day Global Commodities Conference concludes tomorrow. It is the flagship event of the Lugano Commodity Trading Association (LCTA) and serves as a platform to explore trends, opportunities, and challenges in the commodities market, which has been put under strain by the recent military events in the Persian Gulf.

Today, the event was opened by Sergio Ermotti, CEO of the UBS Group. In a fireside chat, the highest-ranking UBS executive did not shy away from questions posed by Roberto Grassi, vice-president of the LCTA, and a large audience. Ermotti also commented on current events such as the U.S. bombing of Iran, the international situation that could prove difficult for the global economy, and the state of integration with Credit Suisse.

On the latter topic, Ermotti pointed out that the timeline announced nearly two years ago has been adhered to and that the integration is now entering its final phase, which will involve migrating most of Credit Suisse’s former Swiss clients onto UBS’s IT platform. A complex IT process that has already begun and will be completed by the end of the year.

Resilient Markets

Last Friday, the world looked one way — today it looks another. The U.S. bombing of Iranian targets could have triggered a financial “Black Monday.” Yet that didn’t happen. According to Ermotti, the reason lies in the fact that financial markets today are much more resilient than just a few years ago. “The situation is still very complicated, but I’m surprised at how calm the markets are today,” admitted the UBS CEO.

Ermotti also addressed the alleged dollar crisis. For now, there are no viable replacements. The euro could be an alternative, but the lack of a unified capital market — i.e., the absence of common debt among EU countries — and other purely political issues within the Eurozone prevent this substitution from being immediate. Even the Japanese yen, British pound, and Swiss franc, though solid currencies, lack sufficient depth and breadth in their respective capital markets. For now, therefore, there is no real alternative to the dollar.

The discussion then turned to tariffs and the problems caused by their imposition on global trade. Ermotti expressed optimism about an agreement between the United States and Europe (including Switzerland), as well as with other trade areas (Asia and Latin America) or individual countries. We are heading toward a bilateral model in international trade, but not a return to a zero-tariff world. After all, Ermotti recalled, even under the Biden administration, the trade tariffs imposed during Donald Trump’s first term were not removed.

Future “Too Big to Fail” Rules

UBS’s position on the recent proposal by the Federal Council regarding future rules for systemically important banks (“too big to fail”) is well known. The demand for higher capital requirements raises costs (as additional capital must be remunerated) and reduces lending capacity. Even an extreme proposal — such as looser banking rules in exchange for more capitalization — would not be acceptable.

Banking, according to Ermotti, is based on trust, which is the most important form of capital. In other words, having more capital should not be seen as a justification for a riskier business model.

By Generoso Chiaradonna, Economics Editor, Corriere del Ticino
Originally published in Italian in the Corriere del Ticino on June 23, 2025 (online) and June 24, 2025 (print edition).

English translation provided by LCTA
Reproduced in full with the author’s kind permission


The outbreak of direct conflict between Israel and Iran marks a major turning point for the Middle East region: Dimitri Loringett from Corriere del Ticino spoke with analist Emily Harding from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

The outbreak of direct conflict between Israel and Iran marks a major turning point for the Middle East region. The risk of escalation is high, and there are fears of attacks on Iranian oil facilities, which account for about one-tenth of global crude production and transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

To find a way out of this explosive situation, attention turns to the United States—but also to China and Russia. Beyond the Middle East, there is also the war in Ukraine, from which the U.S. appears to be gradually disengaging. Ahead of the Global Commodities Conference, organized by the Lugano Commodity Trading Association (LCTA) and which will take place on June 23–24 at the LAC, we spoke with U.S. national security expert Emily Harding from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

While the effects of the war in Gaza—such as the Houthi rebel attacks in the Gulf of Aden (Bab al-Mandeb Strait)—have been somewhat “manageable” for commodity traders, the Israel-Iran situation appears far more dangerous. Do you foresee an escalation or widening of the conflict between Israel and Iran?

«Wider war is possible if Iran chooses to strike US military bases in the Gulf. That would likely bring in the US and could push Gulf countries to strike back. That would be a disastrous choice for Iran. The US could also choose to join the strikes, using heavy bombers to destroy the best-hidden elements of Iran’s nuclear program.»

Can Tel Aviv “afford” another conflict—one that, compared to those with neighboring countries or areas, is potentially much more “demanding”?

«Israel sees Iran as an existential threat. From their view, Iran is the true source of every major threat Israel faces, from Hizballah to the Houthis to Hamas. If not for Iran’s support, none of those actors would be powerful enough to threaten Israel. If Iran were to succeed in creating a nuclear weapon, one missile attack could mean the end of Israel. They viewed this as a necessary war, and the timing was not going to get much better for them to act.»

Regarding oil, market prices immediately reacted to Israel’s attack on Iran, although the current price level around $75 per barrel is significantly lower compared to the $90-95 reached after Hamas attacks on Israel in October 2023. Given the possibility of a further escalation of the Israeli-Iranian conflict, what are the prospects for energy markets, particularly for crude oil?

« I am not directly involved in analyzing energy-related issues, so I won’t speculate on oil prices. The factors driving prices up are going to be enduring, though, from the sanctions on Russia’s shadow fleet to the conflict with Iran.»

As observed during Donald Trump’s recent visit to the Gulf region, the United States seems primarily focused on business with these countries. Advanced technologies, green tech, and the like are rapidly expanding in the Gulf region. Given the underlying instability, how risky is it to invest in these sectors in the area?

Come osservato durante la recente visita di Donald Trump nella regione del Golfo, gli Stati Uniti sembrano concentrarsi principalmente sugli affari con questi Paesi. Le tecnologie avanzate, IA, «green tech» ecc. sono in piena espansione nella regione del Golfo: data l’instabilità di fondo, quanto è rischioso investire in questi settori nella regione?
«Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is quite young, and he has put a heavy emphasis on high tech and green tech for the Kingdom, suggesting it will be a continuing priority.»

In Europe, we tend to focus mainly on the foreign policy of its main economic partner, the United States. What will remain of the Trump administration’s policies after his term? What is the overall vision? For example, will the United States continue to disengage militarily abroad? And what consequences might this have, for instance, on NATO?
«Trump represents a historic shift in US foreign policy, but he is also a symptom of a larger trend inside the US. Many Americans feel, and have felt for a decade or more, that the U.S. was carrying too much of the burden of global security. In other words, Europe was able to provide extensive public services (like healthcare) because the US was carrying the weight of security. While I don’t agree with that view, it is pervasive in the US, and Trump has reset expectations about responsibility sharing.  His approach to NATO reflects this view. It has been encouraging to see so many European nations step up their own defense spending, which will make NATO stronger and more resilient than it has ever been.»

In general, it seems that the United States has definitively abandoned its historic “soft power” approach. To what extent is this intentional? What is the logic behind this shift, which, in the eyes of the rest of the Western world, is a source of concern?
« Trump seems to view himself as a peacemaker. He has hesitated to use US military power, and he has made sweeping statements about his ability to bring peace to various global conflicts, including Ukraine. This administration’s approach seems to be very much geared toward pushing both sides to the negotiating table, but they have shifted somewhat to criticize Moscow for civilian casualties and an unwillingness to negotiate in good faith.»

Looking at the trade tensions with China, is there a risk of escalation that could lead to a conflict (considering the military buildup in Southeast Asia) between the two superpowers? Or will Washington and Beijing manage to reach some form of agreement, given their decades-long economic and trade ties?
«Neither the US nor China want a military conflict. The US should work toward a robust policy of deterrence, so that every day the CCP leadership wakes up and thinks “not today,” because a conflict would be too costly. Meanwhile countries must take steps to minimize their economic dependence on China. Beijing has largely chosen economic coercion as its preferred approach.»

Article originally published in Corriere del Ticino, 17.06.2025 (in Italian)

Republished in full by LCTA with the kind permission of the author and journalist Dimitri Loringett (Corriere del Ticino).

Recently, the Lugano Commodity Trading Association (LCTA) convened a “Commodity Roundtable” at Hotel Splendide Royal in Lugano alongside its 2024 Annual General Meeting.

The masterclass, introduced by President Matteo Somaini, emphasized the challenges encountered by the sector this year, characterized by escalating political tensions within global economic dynamics.

Keep reading here (in Italian): Assemblea Generale 2024 LCTA: professionisti pronti alle sfide (Ticinowelcome.ch, 09.12.2024)

On December 5, 2024, at Hotel Splendide Royal in Lugano, the LCTA held the «Commodity Roundtable» alongside its Annual General Meeting.

Details of the event were covered by the online magazine finewsticino.ch (in Italian): Il trading di materie prime tra rischi geopolitici e normative rigide (05.12.2024)



The October cover of the monthly magazine Ticino Management is dedicated to commodities. Among the interviewees was LCTA Secretary General Monica Zurfluh.

You can read the article here (in Italian): Indipendenza sì, ma da che cosa? (Ticino Management, October 2024, pp. 24-33)

Engaging in discussions on coal is becoming increasingly complex; however, it is a fact that many economies have requirements, particularly in terms of logistics. And although renewables represent the future, it is imperative to acknowledge the current situation: fossil fuels serve as the primary source of funding for renewable energy investments. This outcome stems from a panel discussion among commodity traders that took place on October 11, 2024 at the launch of the second edition of the Certified Commodity Trader Specialist training program promoted by the Lugano Commodity Trading Association and ALMA Impact, which involves about fifteen professionals. Corriere del Ticino reported on this concurrently with the publication of the annual “World Energy Outlook” report by the International Energy Agency (IEA).

You can read the article here (in Italian): Verso l’«era dell’elettricità» con l’aiuto delle fonti fossili (cdt.ch, 17.10.2024)



In a (sponsored) piece on the Corriere del Ticino news portal, SUISSENÉGOCE examines the significance of the commodities sector in Switzerland, emphasizing Lugano’s role in the trade of metals and minerals vital for the energy transition. In a brief interview, LCTA President Matteo Somaini highlights the importance of a stable and sustainable supply, achievable through diversifying supply sources and advancing new technologies, while also acknowledging the increasing attention of investors on ESG considerations.

You can read the article here (in Italian): Commodity Trading: al centro dell’innovazione (cdt.ch, 15.10.2024)


On July 1 and 2, Lugano held the Global Commodities Conference 2024, organized by the Lugano Commodity Trading Association (LCTA), where the commodities industry debated the influence of current geopolitical dynamics and the energy transition on global commodity markets. More than 150 industry professionals from across Switzerland and major centers such as London and Dubai attended the gathering.

Ticino Welcome reported on the details (in Italian): Global Commodities Conference: il trading delle materie prime (ticinowelcome.ch, 19.09.2024)


What is happening to the commodities market and how will it affect the consumers’ pockets? Corriere del Ticino asked LCTA President Matteo Somaini.

You can read the interview here (in Italian): A parte i prezzi di cacao e caffé le commodities restano al palo (cdt.ch, 18.09.2024)

News & Agenda

Newsletter

Do you have a question?
Get in touch.

© LCTA – made by studio daulte

News & Agenda

Newsletter

Do you have a question?
Get in touch.

© LCTA – made by studio daulte